Disquiet Junto: Join Weekly Communal Music Projects • Previous: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 etc. • Current: 21
Projects: Instagr/am/bientLX(RMX): Lisbon RemixedKey Topics: #sound-art, #classical
How To: Submit for ReviewElsewhere: Twitter, SoundCloud (Disquiet & Disquiet Junto), Facebook

Listening to art. Playing with audio. Sounding out technology. Composing in code.

Monthly Archives: January 2011

Two Maverick Institutions: John Cage & the BBC Radiophonic Workshop (Nature)

The new issue of Nature, dated today, January 20, 2011, features a dual-book review I wrote. (That’s issue 469 of Nature, which has been around since the tail end of 1869.) The books are Special Sound: The Creation and Legacy of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop (Oxford) by Louis Niebur and Begin Again: A Biography of John Cage (Knopf) by Kenneth Silverman. Unfortunately, the piece, titled “Music: Pioneers of Sound,” at nature.com is behind a subscriber paywall, but the gist of the review is as follows: both Cage and the BBC Radiophonic were maverick institutions in experimental music, both met their ends during the same decade, and both came to those ends (Cage in 1992, the Radiophonic in 1998) to some extent as an unfortunate consequence of their own expanding notoriety.

Yet despite their similarities, their paths rarely crossed. Cage was, for all his own open-mindedness, a figure in the living pantheon of the mid-century avant-garde, whereas the BBC Radiophonic was by its very charter determined to be populist — a goal more than achieved with its indelible theme song for Doctor Who.

Ironically, the books are the opposites of their subjects: Silverman’s is very much a general-reader survey of a great man’s life and career, whereas the BBC book is an academic inquiry enacted by a professor of musicology. That said, don’t let the latter’s occasional deep dive into tonal analysis scare you off; its real achievement is how Niebur charts the manner in which the Radiophonic navigated the cutthroat bureaucracy of the BBC. Fun fact: The BBC Radiophonic Workshop was not spun out of the BBC Music Department; the Radiophonic owes its existence to the shepherding of the Features and Drama departments. “Every good story needs a villain,” writes Niebur, “and here the Music department fills the role admirably.”

Between Silverman’s biography, the Kyle Gann book on 4’33″ (No Such Thing a Silence, Yale), and the year-end Cage Against the Machine cause célèbre in England, 2010 was a pretty great year for his ongoing legacy. Oh, and my favorite sentence from Silverman’s fairly declarative telling of Cage’s life is this one: “Only five feet two inches tall, he was deemed the greatest living authority on the history of Alaska.” He’s describing the father of Cage’s one-time wife, the striking Xenia Kashevaroff.

And again, if you have subscription access, the piece is at nature.com.

[ Topics: , / Comments: 2 ]

facebook.com/disquiet.fb

After much back’n'forth thinking, I’ve set up a Disquiet.com page on Facebook. It’s at http://facebook.com/disquiet.fb. It will collect a feed of Disquiet.com posts, occasional pings from twitter.com/disquiet, and perhaps once in a while some original, Facebook-only material.

[ Topic: / Comments: 2 ]

Pazz & Jop: 3 Out of 10 Ain’t Bad

The annual Village Voice Pazz & Jop critics poll is out. Of my top-10 album selections (previously posted here, with some comments), just three have votes from other participants. This is par for the course: of the 1,839 albums listed in the poll’s ballots, the majority have only one or two mentions. In contrast, the winner, Kanye West’s My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, has 266 mentions, for 3,250 points. Critics have 100 points to divvy up between the up to 10 albums they select. (Ditto for singles, a poll in which I didn’t participate.)

The three albums I shared with other voters were:

Yellow SwansGoing Places, with 15 mentions, for a total of 141 points;

Scott Tuma‘s Dandelion, with 3 mentions, for a total of 30 points;

Oval‘s O, with 2 mentions, for a total of 20 points (Oval’s Oh was also on the list, with one mention for 10 points).

The list of critics is extensive — more than 700 — and if you peek around, you’ll find some neat variations from the standard music journalists, among them musician Elliott Sharp, who in addition to having five albums on his list for which no one else voted, did a smart thing in his list of favorite singles: he simply selected a favorite track from each of his top 10 albums.

Right now there seems to be a technical glitch on the Voice site, so the album pages linked to from individual critics’ ballot pages don’t list the other critics who voted for the albums. There’s been no major upgrade to the system that the Voice uses to publish the polls, which is unfortunate: no tools to fine-tune comparison between ballots, no links from critics’ ballot pages to their own sites, no links from critics’ ballots to their ballots from previous years, no “artist” pages to collect information on various releases, comments only on article pages (not on ballot or release pages).

Before the rise of the Internet, the annual Pazz & Jop poll was a rare source for music discovery. The ready availability today of opinions makes the poll far less valuable than it once was, but rather than embrace the tools of the web to make the most of its key virtue (the impressive expanse of participants), it’s gotten technologically stagnant. Maybe next year?

A taste of what the poll could be, as a correlated index of opinion, can be had at needlebase.com. That site’s Glenn McDonald is credited with tabulating the poll, and on the needlebase.com page goes into greater depth. In addition to some nifty sorting, it provides individual pages for ballots (here’s mine), including an “empathy” factor that tries to align one critic with others that share some sort of consensus. That consensus, of course, is measured solely by the hard data of specific albums rather than, say, genre or average BPM, and it doesn’t take into consideration, by definition, information the poll neglected to ask about, like, for instance, albums that we were disappointed by (for example, my top “empathy” colleague loved at least one album I couldn’t stand). Again, maybe next year the official Voice poll’s presentation will be enlivened by some of the sorting and collating that needlebase.com touches on.

[ / Leave a comment ]

Lithuanian Silence (4’33″ MP3)

One of the peculiarities of digital recordings of John Cage‘s famous “silent” piece, 4’33″, is that they tend to be exactly 4’33″ in length. That is to say, they remove the framing apparatus that makes a 4’33″ live performance a performance — the approach by the musician to the piano (traditionally, it is a piano on which the piece is/isn’t performed — the latter distinction depending on, for lack of a better word, the listener’s temperament); any sense of dramatic delay, even if only for a millisecond, between each of the piece’s three movements; and the awkward step from performance to audience reception when it is complete (will there be applause?). The adherence to the strict 4’33″ length is arguably contrary to Cage’s philosophy, because if anything, the piece is about being open to experience: even if the work itself is just over four and a half minutes in length, its overall shape is slightly larger still. The harsh on/off of digital reproduction may not do it justice.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Among the most recent recordings of 4’33″ is one by the DIISCC Orchestra of Lithuania, its late-December arrival (courtesy of the netlabel con-v.org) somewhat overshadowed by the Cage Against the Machine phenomenon raging in England. As heard as part of the con-v Con-vpilation, the track (MP3) is a study in vacancy, tremulous silence, and breath-holding pause.

More on the DISCC Orhestra at facebook.com and myspace.com/diissc.

[ Topics: , , , / Leave a comment ]

Arcade on Fire (MP3)

It was nearing the half-year mark for the hexawe.net netlabel — a half year since it had last made public one of its tantalizing bits of abstract chiptune-flavored sample-packed near-anarchic music. But then, fortunately, came “Fat Punch,” credited to Kool Skull (MP3). It bears all the marks of a hexawe.net track: the phaser sound bites, the cut’n'paste madness, the arcade-on-fire intensity, the broken-speaker fuzziness. And like all the label’s releases, it came accompanied by a Zip archive of its constituent parts, allowing you to play with them in the freely available software from littlegptracker.com. You needn’t even install the Tracker software to get a taste of Kool Skull’s track’s inner workings. While the full piece is highly enjoyable, I recommend downloading the Zip file and playing all but the two longest samples (the only two longer than a second) set on random in your MP3 player of choice.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

More on Kool Skull (aka Juan Larrazabal, of Los Angeles) at
datamoshpit.com/koolskull and soundcloud.com/koolskull.

[ Topics: , , , / Comment: 1 ]