Cross-pollinations of Meter and Tone

A new album of drone-work from Daniel Mackenzie

Daniel W J Mackenzie’s *Four Places for Piano* will likely be misread as *Four Pieces for Piano*. There’s a blurry glimpse of one of the title instruments on the album’s cover. As for whether the piano actually played an active role in the recording of the album, that’s a far more blurry topic. *Four Places for Piano* is four pieces of long-form, slowly modulating drones. It opens with the highlight, “Diocleia,” which has several pulses set against each other, most noticeably a bell-like ringing that arrives every eight seconds or so. Other elements run through more quickly or more slowly, but that bell tone is the heart of it. At almost 11 minutes in length, “Diocleia” lets the ears fall prey to various cross-pollinations of meter and tone.

Each track on Mackenzie’s *Four Pieces for Piano* is noticeably distinct from the others, and yet any one of them, once you get three or four minutes in, can, as with much drone music, sound like the background noise of an electrical substation. The similarities are an illusion. Part of the pleasure of *Four Pieces for Piano* is listening not just within a track, but between them. “Duklja” has more of a sense of urgency than the others; it grows as time passes, occasionally pushing the waveforms into something rough-edged. “Zeta” has an even more pronounced bell than “Diocleia,” here like a carillon caught in a loop. And “Podgorica” distinguishes itself with a slow, crunchy beat amid its already noisy churn.

Album posted at [urbanartsberlin.bandcamp.com](https://urbanartsberlin.bandcamp.com/album/four-places-for-piano-2). More from Mackenzie, who also goes by Ekca Liena, at [danielwjmackenzie.com](http://www.danielwjmackenzie.com/).

Saxophone vs. Machine(fabriek)

An asynchronous collaboration loops back on itself.

Machinefabriek turned the tables on his own production technique. As described in an [advance notice](http://www.machinefabriek.nu/index.php/releases_-_collaborations/tides), his forthcoming release with saxophonist Neil Welch began as a one-way affair. He was to provide a foundation (a “backing track,” in the official release language) for Welch to improvise upon. However, upon receiving Welch’s responsive work, Machinefabriek proceeded to work upon it some more. The result, as heard in this four-minute advance listen of an eventual 38-minute release, to be titled *Tides*, makes any discernment between background and foreground imprecise at best. There is a dense blur between the original work and what Welch provided. In part this is because Welch’s work is often heard with several parts layered in a manner that an individual player couldn’t achieve live, except with looping equipment. In part it’s because the horn often dissolves into the greater noise, leading to something akin to John Zorn fronting a Ligeti concerto. But the real beauty of the resulting piece is how segments of Welch’s work were themselves improvised upon by Machinefabriek, who took the nuances and used them as source audio for his own efforts. Welch’s work was, in turn, as much a foundation for Machinefabriek’s efforts as was Machinefabriek’s for Welch’s. It would be interesting, down the road, to be able to listen to what it was that Machinefabriek sent to Welch in the first place.

Track originally posted at [soundcloud.com/machinefabriek](https://soundcloud.com/machinefabriek/tidespreview). More from Welch at [neilwelch.com](http://neilwelch.com/), and from Machinefabriek, aka Rutger Zuydervelt, at [machinefabriek.nu](http://machinefabriek.nu/). The full album is due apparently from Confront, though it isn’t yet showing on the label’s website ([confrontrecordings.com](http://www.confrontrecordings.com/)).

A Solo Guitar Drone

By Toaster of San Jose, California

The musician Toaster’s tagline on Twitter is “I make music by programming things.” However, the origin of his recent track “Beacon, for Marissa” is not a computer but, instead, a guitar. The piece is a nearly 20-minute solo drone, recorded live. Now, “solo” needn’t simply mean singular. There are several lines that thread through “Beacon,” overtones and grungy throbbing strings among them. And a “drone” needn’t simply imply steady-going. Various aspects of the track suggest a trajectory in the stasis, a direction to the flux. There are pause-like moments early in that focus the ear toward shrill bits of noise, and as the piece progresses its low-tide ebbing and flowing become recognizable, familiar, almost song-like in their patterning. “Beacon” is a beautiful, sedate, peaceful apparition — perhaps not music from programming, but certainly music for programming, and other cerebral tasks.

Track originally posted for free download at [soundcloud.com/toaster-1](https://soundcloud.com/toaster-1/beacon-for-marissa). More from Toaster, aka Todd Elliott of San Jose, California, at [toaster.bandcamp.com](https://toaster.bandcamp.com/) and [twitter.com/toddbert](https://twitter.com/toddbert).

Social Media Break

Until January 4, 2016

I usually take off the last two weeks of the year, but this year I’m starting a little earlier with my social-media retreat/cleanse/void/break. I have no idea what truly constitutes “social media” these days. I know [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/dsqt/) is “social,” but I use it mostly as a broadcast stream for short essays accompanying an image — sure, I look at other people’s images, too, and like/comment on occasion, but aside from the “like” aspect, it doesn’t feel all that different from commenting on someone’s blog post. Anyhow, for the most part I mean I won’t be on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/disquiet) or [Facebook](http://facebook.com/disquiet.fb).

See you on the other side.

Strain and Grain

C. Reider returns to the cassette-tape loop

20151120-creider1

C. Reider’s *Tape Loops*, recently released on Linear Obsessional Recordings, returns him to an early favorite media of his, after many years spent in the digital world. The media is magnetic tape, which Reider, who’s based in Colorado, once enjoyed as a participant in the mail-art network.

He revisits what was long ago an everyday technology as something today of an archival and arcane one (though there is a growing number of cassette labels in recent years). There was a physical release of this album, true to its inspiration. That combined a CDR, which was a spiritual grandchild of the cassette, with hand-engineered cassettes that contained a loop. Even though the physical edition is sold out, the digital release is a rewarding one all on its own. It’s a series of looped compositions, half an hour in all. The strain and grain of the tape is evident in every piece, bits of noise, and orchestral glimmering, and vocal warbles, all pieced together amid an overarching mechanical sensibility.

An annotation to the album provides some additional context:

>Getting deep into the process and working with thrift-store cassettes he uses a number of radical techniques to create his tape loops, including lengthening the tape, shredding it, making new tapes from tiny fragments and reassembling them.
>
>The resulting piece is a haunting and mesmeric meditation on the texture of sound recorded on magnetic tape and is one or reider’s most powerful works to date.

A booklet accompanying the release gets into more detail. Here’s an excerpt:

>Some of my experiments involved extending the length of the loop inside the shell. When making a loop housed in a standard tape shell, the filament can’t be too slack or too tight. If it’s too slack, it will get caught in the playback mechanism resulting in the tape being “eaten” (is that how they say it outside of the US?) If too tight the loop just won’t play back. Normally, I would loop the tape around the two tape guide rollers and the two reels inside the re- used tape shells, requiring a strand of tape 9.125 inches in length. That would result in a loop that comes back to the splice point every 5 seconds when played back at the normal speed of 1.875 inches per second. The physical barriers inside the shell dictate the length of the loop. To shorten or lengthen a loop one has to remove or provide more barriers around which the tape will pass. I found that if there were a bunch of new barriers inside the shell, the tape makes a turn at each one (imagine a serpentine fan belt in a car,) meaning more length can fit. More length equals more time. To add barriers, I drilled holes through one side of the cassette shell, and pressed through pieces of PTFE Teflon rod to give me pivot points around which to guide the tape. The most complicated of my pivot-point alterations had the tape traveling around nine different points resulting in a tape length of 19 inches that looped every 10 seconds.
>
>As with most techniques I use in my sound practice, the process of these modifications were easy to do in terms of technique, but they did require some amount of patience and mindfulness.

Audio originally posted at [linearobsessional.bandcamp.com](https://linearobsessional.bandcamp.com/album/tape-loops). More from Reider at [vuzhmusic.com](http://www.vuzhmusic.com/), [soundcloud.com/vuzhmusic](https://soundcloud.com/vuzhmusic), and [twitter.com/vuzhmusic](https://twitter.com/vuzhmusic).

20151120-creider2