Oliver diCicco’s Sirens Sound Sculpture (San Francisco)

An installation by Oliver diCicco, titled Sirens, filled the large hall at the gallery and performance space SomArts (somarts.org) in San Francisco from January 10 through February 14 of this year. I missed the opening, but was fortunate to be almost entirely alone when I stopped by a few days later. Sirens consists of 11 free-standing, drone-emitting sculptures. Their hemispheric shape brings to mind the horns of some mechanical beast, while their purpose suggests oversized tuning forks, and they move with the lilt of a human-proportioned metronome. When turned on, they filled the room with rolling, gently overlapping layers of long, held tones.

In diCicco’s telling, the work was inspired by the ocean — the title comes from the Sirens of mythology, the motion from the waves. An artist’s brief statement, pinned to one wall, includes the following excerpt from the Wallace Stevens poem “Sea Surface Full of Clouds”:

An uncertain green,
Piano-polished, held the tranced machine
Of ocean

The following images show from afar how Sirens was situated in the SomArts space:

And these two show, close up, some of the construction. The top image is the device that emits the tones, while the bottom is the counterweight system:

For the first time ever, I used the movie option on my camera to capture some video, complete with sound. For some reason I can’t figure out how to get this embedded youtube.com video to center horizontally in this post, but that probably won’t bother anyone but me: Continue reading “Oliver diCicco’s Sirens Sound Sculpture (San Francisco)”

Quote of the Week: Assayas & Eno

New York Times movie critic Manohla Dargis on Boarding Gate, the new film from director Olivier Assayas (Demonlover, Clean, Paris Je T’aime):

I was again struck by how he uses music to amplify reality, almost as if he were inviting you to listen to the songs playing in other people’s heads. His use of Brian Eno here is particularly potent. Mr. Eno creates music that drifts around you, enveloping you in moods and waves of feeling, which is precisely what Mr. Assayas does as a filmmaker. Mr. Eno has said that for him making popular music is about “creating new, imaginary worlds and inviting people to join them,”a sentiment that Mr. Assayas no doubt understands.

Read the full review at nytimes.com.

Glistening MP3 EP by Nodepet

The four tracks on Decay by Nodepet sound like the work of some otherworldly glass harmonica, a massive structure that expands to fill whatever room you choose to play the album in. For each track, the primary sound is a glistening but substantive shimmer that has no attack and, true to the title, enormous decay.

Compositionally, the pieces are distinguished not only by the lovely sound of those circumference-riding tones, but by the occasional silences that Nodepet, born Olliver Wichmann, uses to punctuate the drama. “My Enemy Insight” (MP3) contains some of the more threatening additional sounds, compressed flurries of noise that suggest things moving in the dark. “Behind the Mask” (MP3) inserts some additional textures and lurking noise. Aside from a watery undercurrent, “Wall of Fear” (MP3) uses higher pitches than does the rest of the album, which induces some unease, despite the beauty of the tones themselves. And “Last Possible Lie” (MP3), on which the set closes, is Decay‘s quietest and least foreboding entry.

Get additional details at the releasing netlabel, petcord.com. More info on Nodepet/Wichmann, who’s based in Germany, at his website, nodepet.com.

“Szabad” as in Netlabel

The netlabel is among the purest expressions of the Internet’s ability to function as a frictionless environment for art and culture. Netlabels distribute music freely, with the enthusiastic support of the musicians they promote, and while most netlabels focus on a fairly well-defined realm of music, that music is generally defined aesthetically first, rather than geographically or economically. And because of the free model, the music on netlabels rarely evidences any effort to take commercial matters into consideration. These organizations creatively channel the energy of individuals who may never meet in person, but for whom the collective endeavor is a compelling opportunity.

Back in 2006, I gathered the heads of three leading netlabels to discuss what makes netlabels tick — and, in the case of their electronica-leaning labels, what makes them whir, crunch and drone. True to the netlabel culture, we had our conversation online, and it was published as “Free as in Netlabel” on June 17, 2006 (disquiet.com).

Yesterday, one of the participants, András Hargitai of Complementary Distribution (bitlabrecords.com/cod), out of Budapest, Hungary, informed me that the conversation has now been fully translated into Hungarian. That’s no small accomplishment, as the original article, even after being edited down from the raw conversation transcript, clocks in at over 11,000 words. The other participants in the discussion were Nathan Larson of Dark Winter (darkwinter.com), from Minnetonka, Minnesota, and Pedro Leitao of Test Tube (monocromatica.com/netlabel), from Lisbon, Portugal. If you can read Hungarian, there’s more information on the translation at prae.hu, and the article is available for download (PDF).

Stockhausen, Spiropoulos, Steiger @ Yerba Buena (San Francisco)

How many cities on a Monday night can come close to selling out a chamber concert that’s built around a tape-music work dating from the Kennedy administration? Count San Francisco among them.

The performance earlier this week, on March 17, at San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Center for the Arts by the San Francisco Contemporary Music Players included three works: Karlheinz Stockhausen‘s Kontakte (1958-1960), Georgia Spiropoulos‘s Oria (2003), Greek for “threshold,” and Rand Steiger‘s Dreamscape (2004). All featured, to varied ends, a mix of acoustic instrumentation, alternate performance techniques, and electronic processing. Steiger, Chair of the Music Department at the University of San Diego, and Spiropoulos, born in Greece but a resident of Paris, were on hand for a pre-concert discussion. The image below shows them speaking with, at center, David Milnes, the SFCMP Music Director and a member of the music faculty at nearby UC Berkeley.

Two gongs set the scene for the Stockhausen. Light projections cast circular shadows against a back curtain that made them appear like twin suns caught in mid-eclipse. If the setting fit the composer’s interest in myth, the music emphasized his interest in controlled chaos, the origin point for most mythologies. The work was, in effect, a trio: Julie Steinberg on piano and occasional percussion; William Winant on his standard battery of bangable objects; and a pre-recorded synthesized sound bed, managed by Bryan Wolf, who sat at the mixing board throughout the 35-minute piece. Steinberg and Winant moved amid their extensive tools, which were gathered like new-music workstations on either side of the gongs. The pair’s intricate playing involved them aping many of the prerecorded elements, playing against synthesized backdrops, and working in tandem throughout. Steinberg and Winant brought a winning ease and humor to the piece, which like all the music heard during the evening really needed to be seen to be fully appreciated.

Like the Stockhausen, Steiger’s Dreamscape is a mix of acoustic and electric sounds. The piece is scored for flute (Tod Brody), percussion (Daniel Kennedy), piano (Vicki Ray), cello (Stephen Harrison), and electronics (Steiger himself). The composer explained during the pre-concert discussion that he uses software patches he’s developed in the program Max/MSP to affect the sounds produced by the musicians. Thus the mallets of Kennedy’s marimba were capable of emitting glissandi, a neat effect, even if it became less interesting with successive occurrences. Likewise, Brody’s flute occasionally sounded like it was being played in a cavern, and could be heard to have additional notes added in: full chords, courtesy of the software. And while Ray’s piano itself didn’t move, various notes and riffs circled around the room, thanks to six speakers that allowed for spatial operations. Steiger noted that the Max software was initially developed by one of his San Diego colleagues, Miller Puckette, with whom he has collaborated in the past. The image below shows Steiger, along with the Apple laptop running Max/MSP and the printed score.

The playing in Dreamscape required a high level of evident virtuosity — lots of tough lines and percussive counterpoint. Steiger mentioned before the performance that the musicians had been instructed to ignore the additional electronic processing — that their role is to play the score in front of them, and his is to manipulate it, allowing for about a 30- or 40-millisecond delay. The result at times suggested the green-screen drama of one of George Lucas’s later Star Wars movies, in which actors move down a stage set with the knowledge that, to the audience, they’re walking among towering marble edifices or impossible waterfalls. Perhaps Steiger was overstating the extent to which the performers are inured to his digital maneuvers, but there did seem to be something of a disconnect, a disconnect that couldn’t be attributed entirely to those milliseconds. It may have been a missed opportunity. Given his substantial background as a conductor, his performance at the laptop could serve to direct the musicians, to prod them, rather than to just enhance their efforts. He mentioned a commission he’s working on for the American Composers Orchestra, due for a debut next February, which may be more interactive.

The evening’s presentation of Dreamscape was marred on at least three occasions when unintentional feedback appeared: rough static could be heard at the very opening and close, and a long drone appeared toward the end of the piano solo. No one in the audience seemed to mind. While a flubbed note from an instrumentalist can cause dismay, a bit of feedback helps remind everyone that even the technology is being “played.” (Dreamscape will be performed by the quartet Mosaic at the Cleveland Institute of Music this coming April 14.)

If Steiger’s work emphasized the differences between the instruments, through both the demanding composition and the varied electronic effects he applied, Spiropoulos’s Oria emphasized commonality. Scored for an amplified ensemble of bass flute (Brody again), clarinet (William Wohlmacher, alternating with bass clarinet), cello (Leighton Fong), double bass (Richard Worn), piano (Ray again) and percussion (Christopher Froh), the work required all the players to, at times, vocalize small, breathy noises. Those noises were purposefully similar to the scratchboard sounds that the musicians were called upon to produce with their instruments. While there were moments of choreographed interplay, much of the virtuosity required in Oria involved the musicians’s dedication and patience: the ability to eke out a sandpaper rhythm with a piece of Styrofoam on a drum kit, or to pluck muted notes on a cello. The electronic element was limited but effective; the amplification brought to the fore textural aspects of the instrument that are often lost amid playing.

In the pre-concert discussion, Spiropoulos explained that her work was informed by a Japanese performance style that requires instrumentalists to double their playing with singing. Milnes, the SFCMP Music Director, moderating the opening talk, joked that Keith Jarrett, the pianist famous for half-humming through his playing, could be said to do the same thing. At one point in conversation with Spiropoulos, Milnes noted that her score required many untraditional performance techniques. Spiropoulous countered that these “strange sounds,” as he put it, weren’t all that strange, that the plucking of piano strings and the breathy embouchure she required from the woodwinds were “traditional 20th-century techniques.”

Related links: sfcmp.org, georgiaspiropoulos.com, rand.info