The Spaces in Between (MP3)

The poetry of when John Ashbery isn't using words

20130210-john_ashbery

In an exploration of contemporary poetry, **Christian Hawkey** focused not on the words but on the spaces in between. The result is an audio track constructed entirely from the times when the poet John Ashbery is speaking but not saying anything ([MP3](http://media.sas.upenn.edu/pennsound/authors/Hawkey/Hawkey-Christian_Ashbery-project.mp3)). The track was created from material stored in the PennSound Archive. Here’s some background on Hawkey’s project, which grew out of a 2012 Ashbery symposium:

>Hawkey chose to explore his audio archives, or rather, the various recordings of John Ashbery that Pennsound has compiled over the years, beginning with his 1961 reading for the Living Theater.
>
>He became especially interested in listening to the room tone and background noise in all the recordings: the recorded texture of the room, the sound made by the recording device itself, and the non-vocal presence of Ashbery himself (a page turning, lighting a cigarette, sipping from glass of water and swallowing). Working with a friend, the artist Simone Kearney, Hawkey scanned the roughly 45 extant recordings on Pennsound to find, in each one, a clip of “silence”— a brief 3-to-7-second non-vocal moment (longer proved impossible to find) between poems, or between commentary and poems, or between title and poem. They then assembled the clips into one audio file.
>
>It was surprisingly difficult to do this, they found, since most sound engineers remove as much dead sound and background sound as possible, or they snip off the silence at the beginning or end of a reading. Hawkey became increasingly fascinated with this project because it reads a kind of ecopoetics back into the poet’s auditory (and by extension textual) performance: what is normally elided in recordings (background, room tone, noise) is here entirely foregrounded.

[audio:http://media.sas.upenn.edu/pennsound/authors/Hawkey/Hawkey-Christian_Ashbery-project.mp3|titles=”The Silences of John Ashbery”|artists=Christian Hawkey]

What makes the work resonate is the opportunity for aesthetic correlation:

>Hawkey thinks this is analogous to, true to, aspects of Ashbery’s own aesthetic, where junk speech or everyday speech (that which is often censored from normative “literary”writing) is, in his work, front and center, foregrounded as sociolect, various vernaculars, ideolects.

Track found via [jacket2.org](http://jacket2.org/commentary/ashberys-silences-sampled) and [twitter.com/PennSound](https://twitter.com/PennSound/status/300779081643999233).

Mark Rushton Podcast (MP3)

Live ambient improvisation

One thing due to debut in the near future on Disquiet.com is a podcast. The idea has been in the works for awhile, and I’m hopeful it’ll begin in the next month. Among the models for such a podcast is **Mark Rushton**’s fine, long-running series, which recently posted its 57th edition. Rushton is an Iowa-based musician with a keen interest in ambient sound and field recordings, and those impulses are core to the track highlighted in this post, the centerpiece of which is a 17-minute original, improvisatory piece. In addition to the music, Rushton talks a bit about his process, and he recommends some recent listening.

[audio:http://www.markrushton.com/music/podcast/m”¦onpodcast57.mp3|titles=”Mark Rushton Podcast #57 (Live Improvised 17 Minute Piece)”|artists=Mark Rushton]

Track originally posted for free download at [soundcloud.com/markrushtoncom](https://soundcloud.com/markrushtoncom/mark-rushton-podcast-57-live) and [markrushton.com](http://markrushton.com/?p=1421).

Past Week at Twitter.com/Disquiet

Olfactory Artifice

A taste – no, whiff – of my recent collaboration with Paolo Salvagione

20130208-oneforeachshots

This coming Sunday in Berkeley, California, the Codex International Book Fair will open, and among the showcased works is Paolo Salvagione’s wunderkammer *One for Each*, which he produced as the 2012 artist-in-residence at the San Francisco Center for the Book. A book-as-object, it contains five individual pieces, each in is own drawer and aligned with a different sense (hearing, taste, etc.). In the course of my ongoing series of collaborations with Salvagione, I wrote supporting texts, which were printed on letterpress and are contained within the *One for Each* box. I previewed the sonic-related essay ([“Sound and the Tactile Ear”](https://disquiet.com/2012/10/17/paolo-salvagione-one-for-each-sound/)) [here](https://disquiet.com/2012/10/17/paolo-salvagione-one-for-each-sound/) back in October of last year, when the work had its in-progress debut at the Center for the Book. I wrote a sixth document in advance of Sunday’s debut of the finished work; this new document contains a series of three brief descriptions of the scents employed in the smell-related drawer of Salvagione’s *One for Each*. Below are images of the PDF rendering of the document, which is being printed in advance of the show:

20130208-scent2

20130208-scent1

And here is the text of my scent-related essay from *One for Each*:

>”Smell and the Threat of Action”
>
>Can liquids be thought of as sleeping soundly — or do they lie in wait?
>
>These tidy vials contain especially intense odors — they hold in a liquid state things generally thought of as vapors. They are condensed odors awaiting the enlivening act of dispersal. They are unassuming trinkets — trinkets loaded with potential energy.
>
>The liquids are bottled here in small glass containers, elegant objects whose refined contours, whose economical dimensions, whose almost entirely transparent presence, belie what they are capable of. Only a tiny cotton ball keeps them from virtual invisibility, and its inherently cloud-like appearance suggests it as an illustration of vapor itself. Dropped on the floor, any one of them could clear a packed room in a matter of seconds. They’re a glass menagerie of disruptive action.
>
>Take a whiff. What are those smells, what have they in common? It’s musk. In other circumstances, the collective odors might even be said to reek. Musk is, of course, the smell of exertion, of anxiety, of sweat, of fear — of exhilaration.
>
>That word, “musk,”isn’t so unlike the vials themselves; it’s a familiar enough term whose common usage serves to mask its more salacious provenance. What is culture but an opportunity for humankind to subsume its animal nature in everyday normalcy, routine, in ritual, in language? The word “musk”is said to derive from the Sanskrit for “scrotum.”
>
>If there’s a tension at work, it’s the anxiety intentionally inherent in the clinical presentation. A Wunderkammer, a cabinet of curiosities, presents itself as a collection of wonders. But if wonder is understood to be a form of power, then in some way that power must strain in captivity. The tension at work here is the gap between exertion and containment, between the acts these smells suggest and the tidy nature of their display.
>
>Do these odors, seemingly sedate in their liquid state, so refined in their small glass enclosures, sleep soundly — or do they plot escape? Why not open a bottle and come to your own conclusion?

[Here](http://music.hyperreal.org/artists/brian_eno/interviews/detail92.html), for some referential reading, is a transcription of Brian Eno’s 1992 essay [“Scents and Sensibility,”](http://music.hyperreal.org/artists/brian_eno/interviews/detail92.html) in which the ambient pioneer discusses his interest in sound. It is, per chance, part of this week’s reading assignment for the course on sound that I teach at the Academy of Art in San Francisco.

The design of the above card is by Boon Design ([boondesign.com](http://boondesign.com)). More on the Codex event, which runs from Sunday, February 10, through Wednesday, February 13, at [sfcb.org](http://sfcb.org/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=963) and [codexfoundation.org](http://www.codexfoundation.org). More on *One for Each* at [salvagione.com](http://salvagione.com/works/oneforeach/).

Harmonic Transference of Porcelain and Water

Naoyuki Sasanami tweaks Tomoko Sauvage's bowls.

20130208-sauvage

The musician’s experiment is often the listener’s best experience. Free from the anxiety of a final work, the test run is ready to fail and, in the process, to surprise. In addition, the test run by its very nature locates a unique common ground between musician and listener: inexperience. Case in point is “Tomoko Sauvage – Making of a Rainbow (Sasanamix),” a reworking by **Naoyuki Sasanami** of Tomoko Sauvage’s “Making of a Rainbow.” The original, from the Sauvage album *Ombrophilia* (2009), is a study in tonal percussive patterns; the album’s brief liner notes list its constituent parts as “water, porcelain bowls, hydrophones, condenser microphones, metal wire and wood spoons.” Sasanami toyed with the “Rainbow” in the process of trying out some new features in the latest edition of the popular music production tool Ableton Live. Here’s Sasanami’s take, which appears to take harmonal components of the original as their own subset to be tweaked:

https://soundcloud.com/naotko/tomoko-sauvage-rainbow-mix

Sasanami’s was posted for free download at [soundcloud.com/naotko](https://soundcloud.com/naotko/tomoko-sauvage-rainbow-mix). Check out the original (streaming only) at [soundcloud.com/tomokosauvage](https://soundcloud.com/tomokosauvage/making-of-a-rainbow). The above image is a detail of the cover of *Ombrophilia*, available from [tomokosauvage.bandcamp.com](http://tomokosauvage.bandcamp.com/).