Images of the Week: Sketches of Dismembered Pianos

What happens when discarded pianos are rejuvenated and extended with technology? It should look something along these lines:

That’s a rough sketch by artist Hugo Solís of his interactive sound sculpture “Metaphors for Dead Pianos,” which opens at the Seattle gallery Jack Straw on January 29 and runs through April 2, 1010.

Photos of two previous public renditions of “Metaphors” from last year (first at the Ex-Convento del Carmen in Guadalajara, and later at Biblioteca Vasconcelos in Mexico City) appear at the website of Eric Thompson (nestofdemons.com), who assisted in their installation. Here’s one of Thompson’s photos:

The original title of the work is “Metáforas para Pianos Muertos,” in the native Spanish of Solís, who was born in Mexico City and is pursuing his Ph.D. at DXArts in Seattle, aka the Center for Digital Arts and Experimental Media at the University of Washington Seattle.

The image of a suspended piano, its innards splayed and connected to a raw grid of electronics, brings to mind David Byrne’s recent work “Playing the Building,” in which an organ is rigged to trigger sounds from inside an architectural site. But whereas Byrne’s piece physically links an antiquated instrument to a building, in the case of Solís’s “Metaphors” the relation of building to instrument is one in which the expansive space allows for the instrument to be taken apart — essentially allowing individuals to move inside the instrument. In that sense, “Metaphors” is in the tradition of the prepared piano, in which the insides of the object are treated with string, tape, metal, and other items in order not only to alter its sound, but to bring to the surface aspects that might have come to be taken for granted, made almost invisible, to the audience.

The brief description at the Jack Straw gallery states, in part,

“The poetical goal [of ‘Metaphors’] is to revive the instruments using a contemporary sonic perspective. The pianos are extended with custom electronic circuits, custom software, microcontrollers, sensors, motors, and solenoids.”

It would be interesting to know if the addition of these motorized, electric components is part of a metaphor intended to depict the piano, and the musical and cultural legacy associated with it, as something in need of life support.

More at hugosolis.net and jackstraw.org.

Quote of the Week: What Is and Isn’t Repertoire

From an interview with Robert Carl, author of Terry Riley’s In C (Oxford Press, 2009):

I think there’s a subtle but a real difference, though, between the repertoire and In C. In C has an open instrumentation and an open duration. And as a consequence of the kind of accordion structure it has, where it can expand or contract, the relationships between the modules are also different from performance to performance, even though the sequence always remains the same. Every time someone decides to perform it, every time someone decides to record it, it’s a new version, maybe a new realization. Maybe we should be using the word realization instead of interpretation, because interpretation suggests a 19th-century ideal of a score which is a fixed artifact that one is supposed to realize as close as possible to the text. But with In C, you can only get so close and then like a magnet you bounce off it.

The distinction is an interesting one, and from reading the interview, it’s clear that Carl is no dogmatist. He’s not making a stark distinction here that he’ll then defend to the hilt. He’s pointing out, in his word, the subtle distinction between what is understood to be “repertoire” and what Riley’s In C proved to be. This is a distinction between works whose depiction in standard musical notation is fairly fixed, and those works, such as Riley’s, that are fluid, in that they depend as much if not more on instructions/procedures as on musical notes. The score for In C, for example, if half notation (53 short melodic segments) and half “Performing Directions” (including such ambiguous koans as “If for some reason a pattern can’t be played, the performer should omit it and go on”).

In complimenting several renditions of In C that he thinks are particularly successful, Carl says, “For me, I like the works that take off from it and actually make truly new pieces, but that’s just my taste.”

The full interview, conducted by Frank J. Oteri, appears at newmusicbox.org. The full score of In C is available for free download at otherminds.org: PDF.

Past Week at Twitter.com/Disquiet

  • Please Retweet and Sign this Petition 'Make Apple allow audio file sharing for music apps' – http://301.to/ftv #
  • Oh, if you purchase budget earbuds with "extended bass support," that means you end up having to use the reduced-bass setting on your iPod. #
  • Currently playing in the kitchen: Chamber Trio for Drip Coffee, Cooling Stainless Steel Kettle, and Fluorescent Bulb (Adagissimo). #
  • Starting to get "All Summer in a Day"/"The Long Rain" feeling. When home not sure background noise is precipitation or radio/TV on static. #
  • I'd really like to hear a Cake song remixed by Giuseppe Ielasi, especially based on "03" off his Aix album. #
  • My Village Voice Pazz & Jop ballot: http://is.gd/6HGYi Same as my year-end top 10 but you can click thru to see who also liked the albums. #
  • Does the rain amplify or otherwise funnel the sound of sirens, or is there just that much emergency activity during a downpour? #
  • Bought new, inexpensive earbuds (with mic). Cord is fabric, like from old lamp or iron. Thus flexible; less prone than plastic to cracking. #
  • Major thunder over San Francisco — thick, deep Ten Commandments thunder. #
  • Definite incongruity between the birdsong-based field recordings playing inside, and the bird-less, rain-ready skies outside. #
  • Belated RIP, musician Walter J. Carpenter (b. 1982), aka wwcarpen, aka aghost, passed away November 2009. Legacy site: http://is.gd/6s69A #
  • Found iPhone. Went to Apple store to get it back to its owner. Genius-bar guy says, "Sure you don't wanna keep it? Goes for a lot on eBay." #
  • Bill Fontana environmental sound-art piece at @sfmoma today — but will the free admission make it too difficult to get in? #

The Instrumental Pop of the Brothers Fallen (MP3s)

“All flutters, bumps and whispers by Fallen” — that phrase is the only hint at what’s inside the album Feathers, released late in December as a free download on the Resting Bell label by the duo Fallen, which consists of brothers Andrew and Richard Fryer, who are from the south of England, and their small collection of bedroom music-making tools. The phrase appears on the back cover of Feathers, like an epitaph — an association made all the stronger by the image behind it, of leaves in varying states of decay.

[audio:http://www.archive.org/download/rb076/01-feathers.mp3|titles=”Feathers”|artists=Fallen] [audio:http://www.archive.org/download/rb076/04-iron_bark.mp3|titles=”Iron Bark”|artists=Fallen] [audio:http://www.archive.org/download/rb076/06-clung_to_the_wreckage.mp3|titles=”Clung to the Wreckage”|artists=Fallen]

The head-nodding rhythm of the opening (and title) track sounds like crushed cotton dancing among steam pipes, its soft tones bounce amid slow pounds of percussion. It has all the structure of mechanized pop, but at a tempo that is better suited to film or TV use than to radio. Which is very much in its favor (MP3).

Even better is “Iron Bark,” which for some time gives the impression that it doesn’t quite know where it’s going. It moves between synth and electric piano before introducing all manner of oddities: a brief double-time drum pattern, warped vocal snippets, broken beats. Ultimately it’s classic homemade electronic pop: music in which the composition is more a matter of layers being added than of complex melodic or thematic development. The accrual works here because the elements are hinted at before they are fully introduced. And because they’re all different enough that the additions increase not just overall sonic density but interior contrast (MP3).

“Woven on the Wind,” like the title track, ably mixes soft and hard — not soft and loud, the way the Pixies did, but soft and hard: a main foreground sound that is the sonic equivalent of lush gray flannel, and then these hard poppy beats that slice it to pieces (MP3). You know the rhythm; it’s the auto-pop pneumatic beat of Brian Eno’s collaborations with John Cale and Paul Simon, or of Cornershop at its best.

The other half of Feathers‘s six songs are closer to true pop music, with half-sung lyrics that inevitably relegate the non-vocal music to background.

Get the full release at restingbell.net.